Exploratory learning is a type of active learning by supporting learners in freely exploring relevant instructional resources; learners take a more active role in their learning rather than being passive receivers of information. It’s a popular pedagogical method for integrated STEM education that involves multiple disciplines and knowledge domains. However, empirical evaluations have shown that exploratory learning is not always effective for all learners and that some learners may benefit from more structured, explicit instructions as more traditional intelligent tutoring support. In this paper, we focus on how to support the effective knowledge dissemination and learning results of learners in the process of autonomous exploratory learning without weakening the role of learners in an active learning environment. A practical strategy to support exploratory learning in integrated STEM education was proposed by combining scaffolding questioning and Computational Thinking (CT). First, we analyze how to optimize teachers' questioning strategies to spread knowledge effectively and make learners' learning process more active. Then, how to take advantage of the benefits of CT was addressed. Finally, we construct a Problem-Oriented Learning Model of Integrating CT (POLMICT) suitable for K-12 STEM education. By applying POLMICT to STEM course in middle school, we concluded that scaffolding questioning strategies can be used as a bridge for teachers to impart knowledge to learners to improve the effectiveness of exploratory learning, and embedding CT in this process helps learners to explore and ensure their positive role in the STEM environment.
Published in | International Journal of Elementary Education (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17 |
Page(s) | 93-99 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
STEM Education, Exploratory Learning, Computational Thinking, Scaffolding Questioning, Learning Process
[1] | Holmlund T D, Lesseig K, Slavit D. Making sense of STEM education in K-12 contexts [J]. International Journal of STEM Education, 2018, 5 (1). |
[2] | Keeley-Webb Copridge, Uttamchandani Suraj, Birdwell Tracey. Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms [J]. Innovative Higher Education, 2021, 46 (2): 205-221. |
[3] | J Qin, Gangshan FU, Education S O, et al. Research on Design-based Learning for STEM Education: Model Construction and Case Analysis [J]. e-Education Research, 2018. |
[4] | Zhao H C. The Design and Implement of Middle School Students' Inquiry Learning from the Perspective of STEM Education [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2017. |
[5] | Catarina Correia, Harrison Christine. Teachers' beliefs about Inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice [J]. Research in Science and Technological Education, 2019, 38. |
[6] | M Chen, Chen Z, School S-Y. A-STEM: A Value Reconstruction of the Interdisciplinary Integrative Education Mode [J]. Research in Educational Development, 2019 (06), 15-22. |
[7] | Shannon Navy, Kaya Fatma. PBL as a pedagogical approach for integrated STEM: Evidence from prospective teachers [J]. School Science and Mathematics, 2020, 120221-232. |
[8] | Bielik T, Yarden A. Promoting the asking of research questions in a high-school biotechnology inquiry-oriented program [J]. International Journal of STEM Education, 2016, 3 (1): 15. |
[9] | Rim Kyung hwa, An Jung hyun. Design of Flipped Learning with Strategic Questioning to Improve Student's Problem-Solving Competency in Engineering [J]. Journal of Practical Engineering Education, 2016, 8 (2). |
[10] | Zhong Qi, Tang Yao, Zeng Xiangzhi. The Teaching Strategies and Practice Exploration of STEM Based on PBL [J]. Digital Education, 2020, (04), 78-83. |
[11] | Jeannette Wing. Computational Thinking [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2006, 4933-35. |
[12] | Joseph Lyon, Magana Alejandra. Computational thinking in higher education: A review of the literature [J]. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2020, 28. |
[13] | Michael Vallance, Towndrow Phillip. Computational thinking and interdisciplinary learning: time to focus on pedagogy [J]. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2020, 15180-200. |
[14] | F Fernandez, Arco-Tirado Jose, Carrillo-Rosua Javier, et al. Making STEM Education Objectives Sustainable through a Tutoring Program [J]. Sustainability, 2020, 126653. |
[15] | Zhu K, Jia X X, University H N. Research on the Development Strategy of Computational Thinking Ability Under the View of STEM [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2018. |
[16] | Regina Enebechi, Nzewi Uchenna. The Effects of Cueing Questions as Instructional Scaffolding of Students' Interest in Biology [J]. 2021, VOL. 1, NO. 288-99. |
APA Style
Qian Qian, Yuan Liu, Hao Kun. (2021). Supporting Exploratory Learning with Questioning and Computational Thinking in Integrated STEM Education. International Journal of Elementary Education, 10(3), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17
ACS Style
Qian Qian; Yuan Liu; Hao Kun. Supporting Exploratory Learning with Questioning and Computational Thinking in Integrated STEM Education. Int. J. Elem. Educ. 2021, 10(3), 93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17
AMA Style
Qian Qian, Yuan Liu, Hao Kun. Supporting Exploratory Learning with Questioning and Computational Thinking in Integrated STEM Education. Int J Elem Educ. 2021;10(3):93-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17, author = {Qian Qian and Yuan Liu and Hao Kun}, title = {Supporting Exploratory Learning with Questioning and Computational Thinking in Integrated STEM Education}, journal = {International Journal of Elementary Education}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {93-99}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeedu.20211003.17}, abstract = {Exploratory learning is a type of active learning by supporting learners in freely exploring relevant instructional resources; learners take a more active role in their learning rather than being passive receivers of information. It’s a popular pedagogical method for integrated STEM education that involves multiple disciplines and knowledge domains. However, empirical evaluations have shown that exploratory learning is not always effective for all learners and that some learners may benefit from more structured, explicit instructions as more traditional intelligent tutoring support. In this paper, we focus on how to support the effective knowledge dissemination and learning results of learners in the process of autonomous exploratory learning without weakening the role of learners in an active learning environment. A practical strategy to support exploratory learning in integrated STEM education was proposed by combining scaffolding questioning and Computational Thinking (CT). First, we analyze how to optimize teachers' questioning strategies to spread knowledge effectively and make learners' learning process more active. Then, how to take advantage of the benefits of CT was addressed. Finally, we construct a Problem-Oriented Learning Model of Integrating CT (POLMICT) suitable for K-12 STEM education. By applying POLMICT to STEM course in middle school, we concluded that scaffolding questioning strategies can be used as a bridge for teachers to impart knowledge to learners to improve the effectiveness of exploratory learning, and embedding CT in this process helps learners to explore and ensure their positive role in the STEM environment.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Supporting Exploratory Learning with Questioning and Computational Thinking in Integrated STEM Education AU - Qian Qian AU - Yuan Liu AU - Hao Kun Y1 - 2021/09/15 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17 T2 - International Journal of Elementary Education JF - International Journal of Elementary Education JO - International Journal of Elementary Education SP - 93 EP - 99 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7640 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20211003.17 AB - Exploratory learning is a type of active learning by supporting learners in freely exploring relevant instructional resources; learners take a more active role in their learning rather than being passive receivers of information. It’s a popular pedagogical method for integrated STEM education that involves multiple disciplines and knowledge domains. However, empirical evaluations have shown that exploratory learning is not always effective for all learners and that some learners may benefit from more structured, explicit instructions as more traditional intelligent tutoring support. In this paper, we focus on how to support the effective knowledge dissemination and learning results of learners in the process of autonomous exploratory learning without weakening the role of learners in an active learning environment. A practical strategy to support exploratory learning in integrated STEM education was proposed by combining scaffolding questioning and Computational Thinking (CT). First, we analyze how to optimize teachers' questioning strategies to spread knowledge effectively and make learners' learning process more active. Then, how to take advantage of the benefits of CT was addressed. Finally, we construct a Problem-Oriented Learning Model of Integrating CT (POLMICT) suitable for K-12 STEM education. By applying POLMICT to STEM course in middle school, we concluded that scaffolding questioning strategies can be used as a bridge for teachers to impart knowledge to learners to improve the effectiveness of exploratory learning, and embedding CT in this process helps learners to explore and ensure their positive role in the STEM environment. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -