Reading materials for elementary school students generally do not have readability in accordance with the measurement results so that the literacy level of students is low, as shown by the survey results from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization which noted that the literacy level of Indonesian society was only 0.001 percent. Therefore, it is necessary to measure readability so that the material in books used in learning is in accordance with the age level of readers and can be understood by students. With these conditions, this study aims to overcome the problem of reading materials in elementary schools that are not in accordance with their readability so that they do not support efforts to develop reading literacy. Reading materials in elementary schools need to be measured through a readability measurement in order to know the suitability of readability with the age of the reader. One of the formulas that can be used to measure readability is the SMOG formula (Simple Measure of Goobledygook), this formula is simpler because it does not use graphs only considers the number of sentences and difficult words. This research uses quantitative methods in the process of measuring and collecting data. The research instruments used text readability measurement, text comprehension instrument questionnaire, literacy measurement and student reading habit questionnaire. Based on the results of the linear regression test, there is a relationship between the results of the readability measurement and the results of the student comprehension measurement of 0.688. The positive correlation shows that the higher the score value of the readability measurement results, the lower the students' understanding of the reading. The results show that reading books used in elementary schools have a high readability index value, so that it can reduce students' understanding of reading materials used in learning.
Published in | International Journal of Elementary Education (Volume 13, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12 |
Page(s) | 31-38 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
SMOG (Simple Measure of Goobledygook), Readability Index, Reading Literacy
No. | Story Text Title | Chapters and Pages | Packet Book | Measurement Results | Qualification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tak Muat Lagi | Chapter 1, 3-6 | Bahasa Indonesia | 12.13 | High School | |
Kepala Suku Len | Chapter 1, 9-12 | Bahasa Indonesia | 12.05 | High School | |
Berkenalan Lebih dengan Indonesia | Chapter 2, 28-30 | Bahasa Indonesia | 11.77 | High School | |
Jauh dan Dekat | Chapter 2, 40-42 | Bahasa Indonesia | 10.62 | High School | |
Ada Vampir di Rumah Ini | Chapter 3, 58-61 | Bahasa Indonesia | 10.4 | High School | |
Suka dan Tidak Suka | Chapter 1, 19-20 | IPAS | 9.95 | High School | |
Marakka bola: Tradisi Gotong Royong Memindahkan Rumah | Chapter 6, 155-156 | IPAS | 9.86 | High School | |
Hubungan antara Serangga dan Bunga | Chapter 7, 183-184 | IPAS | 9.86 | High School | |
Berkenalan dengan Uang | Chapter 8, 199-200 | IPAS | 8.83 | Middle School | |
Peraturan Tertulis dan Tidak Tertulis | Chapter 8, 204 | IPAS | 8.57 | Middle School |
No. | Story Text Title | SMOG Measurement Results | Comprehensibility Test Results | Average | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDN Rajagaluh Kidul II | Al-Irsyad Al-Islamiyah Elementary School | MI Miftahul Ulum | ||||
1. | Tak Muat Lagi | 12.13 | 45 | 63 | - | 54 |
2. | Kepala Suku Len | 12.05 | - | - | 53 | 53 |
3. | Berkenalan Lebih dengan Indonesia | 11.77 | - | 72,8 | - | 72,8 |
4. | Jauh dan Dekat | 10.62 | - | 72 | 74 | 73 |
5. | Ada Vampir di Rumah Ini | 10.4 | 60 | 90 | - | 75 |
6. | Suka dan Tidak Suka | 9.95 | 75 | - | 70 | 72,5 |
7. | Marakka bola: Tradisi Gotong Royong Memindahkan Rumah | 9.86 | 65 | - | 64 | 64,5 |
8. | Hubungan antara Serangga dan Bunga | 9.86 | - | - | 73,3 | 73,3 |
9. | Berkenalan dengan Uang | 8.83 | - | 93,3 | 92,5 | 92,9 |
10. | Peraturan Tertulis dan Tidak Tertulis | 8.57 | 45 | 70 | - | 57,5 |
Model Summary | ||||||
Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | ||
1 | .829a | .688 | .649 | .698 | ||
a. Predictors: (Constant), AVERAGE | ||||||
ANOVAa | ||||||
Model | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
1 | Regression | 8.599 | 1 | 8.599 | 17.636 | .003b |
Residuals | 3.901 | 8 | .488 | |||
Total | 12.500 | 9 | ||||
a. Dependent Variable: SMOG | ||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), AVERAGE |
No | Pertanyaan | SDN Rajagaluh Kidul II | SD Al-Irsyad Al-Islamiyah | MI Miftahul Ulum | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Apakah kamu selalu membaca setiap hari? | Tidak | Kadang | Selalu | Tidak | Kadang | Selalu | Tidak | Kadang | Selalu |
- | 31,3 | 62,5 | 29,6 | 66,7 | - | - | 76,5 | 23,5 | ||
2. | Kebiasaan apa yang kamu sukai pada saat membaca? | Hening | Musik | Ramai | Hening | Musik | Ramai | Hening | Musik | Ramai |
68,8 | 18,8 | 12,5 | 59,3 | 33,3 | 7,4 | 64,7 | 23,5 | 11,8 | ||
3. | Dalam sehari, berapa banyak buku yang kamu baca? | Satu | Dua | Lebih dari 3 | Satu | Dua | Lebih dari 3 | Satu | Dua | Lebih dari 3 |
56,3 | 25 | 18,8 | 66,7 | 22,2 | 11,1 | 47,1 | 29,4 | 23,5 | ||
4. | Hal apa yang akan kamu lakukan jika terdapat buku-buku yang baru? | Tidak dibaca | Disimpan Saja | Segera Membaca | Tidak dibaca | Disimpan saja | Segera Membaca | Tidak dibaca | Disimpan saja | Segera Membaca |
18,8 | - | 75 | 14,8 | 25,9 | 59,3 | - | - | 97,1 | ||
5. | Bagaimana perasaanmu jika membaca buku di perpustakaan atau di toko buku? | Tertarik | Tidak | Biasa Saja | Tertarik | Tidak | Biasa saja | Tertarik | Tidak | Biasa saja |
68,8 | - | 25 | 40,7 | 18,5 | 40,7 | 61,8 | - | 38,2 | ||
6. | Apa yang biasanya kamu baca? | Novel | Komik | Buku pelajaran | Novel | Komik | Buku pelajaran | Novel | Komik | Buku pelajaran |
25 | 43,8 | 31,3 | - | 77,8 | 22,2 | 17,6 | 32,4 | 50 | ||
7. | Topik apa yang paling kamu sukai dalam membaca? | Petualangan | Komedi | Pengetahuan | Petualangan | Komedi | Pengetahuan | Petualangan | Komedi | Pengetahuan |
50 | 12,5 | 37,5 | 74,1 | 11,1 | 14,8 | 32,4 | 17,6 | 50 |
SMOG | Simple Measure of Goobledygook |
SD | Sekolah Dasar (Elementary School) |
SDN | Sekolah Dasar Negeri (State Elementary School) |
MI | Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (School at the Basic Education Level Equivalent to Basic Education Within the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia) |
LKS | Lembar Kerja Siswa (Student Worksheet) |
[1] | I. S. Rohim, (2022). “Keterbacaan Buku Teks Keterbacaan Buku Teks Bahasa Sunda Rancagé Diajar Kelas X Untuk SMA/SMK/MAK,” Piwulang: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa, 10(1), 89–94. |
[2] |
S. Z. Maulida and T. Ningtyas, (2023). “Keterbacaan Teks Berita di Kompas.com sebagai Alternatif Bahan Ajar Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia (Readability of News Texts on Kompas.com as an Alternative Teaching Material for Indonesian Language Subjects),” Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 9(1), 208-221.
https://jurnal.syekhnurjati.ac.id/index.php/jeill/article/view/13189 |
[3] |
A. Faren Nugrahani et al., (2024). “Analisis Keterbacaan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Indonesia Pada Kelas I SD Berdasarkan Grafik Fry,” JEMARI: Jurnal Edukasi Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 6(1), 46–51.
https://journal.unuha.ac.id/index.php/jemari/article/view/3017 |
[4] | K. N. Yasa, (2013). “KECERMATAN FORMULA KETERBACAAN SEBAGAI PENENTU KEEFEKTIFAN TEKS,” 46(3), 238-245. |
[5] | A. Yazidi, S. Harapan, K. Bogor, and R. Anggraeni, (2018). “KETERBACAAN BUKU AJAR BAHASA INDONESIA DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA (TEXT BOOK READABILITY OF INDONESIAN LANGUAGE IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL), 7(2), 293-300. |
[6] |
D. Noviani, Y. Priyanti, and S. (2022). “Pelatihan Pembuatan Bahan Ajar Pada Guru SMA Bina Warga (BW) 2 Palembang.” 3(1), 161-170.
https://ejournal.stebisigm.ac.id/index.php/AKM/article/view/448 |
[7] | A. S. Komalasari and D. Riani. (2023). “EDUKASI MANFAAT LITERASI MEMBACA DAN MENULIS DI SMK PGRI 3 BOGOR,” JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT UIKA JAYA, 1(2), 82-92. |
[8] | N. Zahra and N. Amaliyah. (2023). “ANALISIS FAKTOR RENDAHNYA LITERASI SISWA DI KELAS 4 SDN SUSUSKAN 03 PAGI,” Research and Development Journal of Education, 9(2), 898-905. |
[9] | Idhoofiyatul Fatin,. (2017). “KETERBACAAN BUKU TEKS BAHASA INDONESIA KELAS X KURIKULUM 2013 EDISI REVISI 2016 DENGAN FORMULA FRY,” 2(1), 21-33. |
[10] | B. Widharyanto,; Rishe, P. Dewi, and S. Krismawati. (2016). “KETERBACAAN WACANA BUKU TEKS EKSPRESI DIRI DAN AKADEMIK UNTUK SMK DENGAN GRAFIK FRY, TES KLOS, DAN SMOG: STUDI KASUS DI SMK N 1 CILACAP DAN SMK N 4 YOGYAKARTA, 28(2), 245-260. |
[11] | K. Leonard Grabeel, J. Russomanno, S. Oelschlegel, E. Tester, and R. E. Heidel. (2018). “Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: A comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(1), 38–45. |
[12] | S. Kusmana, I. Mulyaningsih, M. Suryaman, and A. Septiaji. (2021). “PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR TEKS FABEL BERMUATAN KEARIFAN LOKAL UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA (Development of Fables Text Teaching Materials with Local Authenticity for Indonesian Language Learning),” 27(1), 55-65. |
[13] | I. Magdalena, R. O. Prabandani, E. S. Rini, M. A. Fitriani, and A. A. Putri. (2020). “ANALISIS PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR,” 2(2), 180-187. |
[14] | A. Putri Bungsu and F. Dafit. (2021). “Pelaksanaan Literasi Membaca di Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 522–527. |
[15] | D. Restu Afghani et al., (2022). “Budaya Literasi Membaca di Perpustakaan untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Holistik bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” Universitas Muhammadiyah Karanganyar, 4(2), 143–152. |
[16] |
H. M. Zakiah and Y. Sukmandari. (2024). “Problematika Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” TSAQOFAH, 4(2), 1246–1257.
https://ejournal.yasin-alsys.org/index.php/tsaqofah/article/view/2680 |
[17] | M. P. Dr. Imam Machali. (2021). “METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF,” 23. |
[18] | H. Delaila Siregar, M. Wassalwa, K. Janani, and I. S. Harahap. (2024). “ANALISIS UJI HIPOTESIS MENGGUNAKAN UJI PARAMETRIK’’ 3(1), 67-79. |
[19] |
P. H. Pebriana, (2021)“Analisis Keterbacaan Buku Teks Siswa Kelas IV Pada Tema I Dengan Menggunakan Grafik Fry,” 3(1), 28-35.
https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jpdk/article/view/1340 |
APA Style
Dalillah, N. A., Ismayanti, F., Azzahra, E. F., Kusmana, S., Rahayu, I. (2024). SMOG (Simple Measure of Goobledygook) Readibility Index in Selecting Reading Materials and Reading Literacy Skills of Primary School Student. International Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12
ACS Style
Dalillah, N. A.; Ismayanti, F.; Azzahra, E. F.; Kusmana, S.; Rahayu, I. SMOG (Simple Measure of Goobledygook) Readibility Index in Selecting Reading Materials and Reading Literacy Skills of Primary School Student. Int. J. Elem. Educ. 2024, 13(2), 31-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12
AMA Style
Dalillah NA, Ismayanti F, Azzahra EF, Kusmana S, Rahayu I. SMOG (Simple Measure of Goobledygook) Readibility Index in Selecting Reading Materials and Reading Literacy Skills of Primary School Student. Int J Elem Educ. 2024;13(2):31-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12, author = {Nida Azhari Dalillah and Febry Ismayanti and Ersa Fanniyah Azzahra and Suherli Kusmana and Ira Rahayu}, title = {SMOG (Simple Measure of Goobledygook) Readibility Index in Selecting Reading Materials and Reading Literacy Skills of Primary School Student }, journal = {International Journal of Elementary Education}, volume = {13}, number = {2}, pages = {31-38}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeedu.20241302.12}, abstract = {Reading materials for elementary school students generally do not have readability in accordance with the measurement results so that the literacy level of students is low, as shown by the survey results from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization which noted that the literacy level of Indonesian society was only 0.001 percent. Therefore, it is necessary to measure readability so that the material in books used in learning is in accordance with the age level of readers and can be understood by students. With these conditions, this study aims to overcome the problem of reading materials in elementary schools that are not in accordance with their readability so that they do not support efforts to develop reading literacy. Reading materials in elementary schools need to be measured through a readability measurement in order to know the suitability of readability with the age of the reader. One of the formulas that can be used to measure readability is the SMOG formula (Simple Measure of Goobledygook), this formula is simpler because it does not use graphs only considers the number of sentences and difficult words. This research uses quantitative methods in the process of measuring and collecting data. The research instruments used text readability measurement, text comprehension instrument questionnaire, literacy measurement and student reading habit questionnaire. Based on the results of the linear regression test, there is a relationship between the results of the readability measurement and the results of the student comprehension measurement of 0.688. The positive correlation shows that the higher the score value of the readability measurement results, the lower the students' understanding of the reading. The results show that reading books used in elementary schools have a high readability index value, so that it can reduce students' understanding of reading materials used in learning. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - SMOG (Simple Measure of Goobledygook) Readibility Index in Selecting Reading Materials and Reading Literacy Skills of Primary School Student AU - Nida Azhari Dalillah AU - Febry Ismayanti AU - Ersa Fanniyah Azzahra AU - Suherli Kusmana AU - Ira Rahayu Y1 - 2024/05/30 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12 T2 - International Journal of Elementary Education JF - International Journal of Elementary Education JO - International Journal of Elementary Education SP - 31 EP - 38 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7640 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241302.12 AB - Reading materials for elementary school students generally do not have readability in accordance with the measurement results so that the literacy level of students is low, as shown by the survey results from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization which noted that the literacy level of Indonesian society was only 0.001 percent. Therefore, it is necessary to measure readability so that the material in books used in learning is in accordance with the age level of readers and can be understood by students. With these conditions, this study aims to overcome the problem of reading materials in elementary schools that are not in accordance with their readability so that they do not support efforts to develop reading literacy. Reading materials in elementary schools need to be measured through a readability measurement in order to know the suitability of readability with the age of the reader. One of the formulas that can be used to measure readability is the SMOG formula (Simple Measure of Goobledygook), this formula is simpler because it does not use graphs only considers the number of sentences and difficult words. This research uses quantitative methods in the process of measuring and collecting data. The research instruments used text readability measurement, text comprehension instrument questionnaire, literacy measurement and student reading habit questionnaire. Based on the results of the linear regression test, there is a relationship between the results of the readability measurement and the results of the student comprehension measurement of 0.688. The positive correlation shows that the higher the score value of the readability measurement results, the lower the students' understanding of the reading. The results show that reading books used in elementary schools have a high readability index value, so that it can reduce students' understanding of reading materials used in learning. VL - 13 IS - 2 ER -