Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Managers' Readiness and Strategies for Severe Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in Gauteng, South Africa

Received: 15 July 2024     Accepted: 14 August 2024     Published: 26 September 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In South Africa, learners with severe to profound intellectual disabilities have not had access to public funded education and support, leaving them vulnerable and excluded from the services available to all school-aged children. To address this national disparity, the South African government developed a Draft Policy Framework for the Provision of Quality Education and Support for Children with Severe to Profound Intellectual Disabilities, which is now being implemented in special care centres at a national level. In Gauteng, the draft policy is being implemented at the provincial level by the Gauteng Department of Education in order to achieve the national mandate. The goal of this study was to investigate how Special Care Centre managers address the challenges of managing centres for learners with intellectual disabilities in Gauteng Province. It examines the adequacy of preparation programs for these managers and evaluates the management strategies used to overcome challenges arising from deficiencies in these programs. Using an exploratory mixed-method approach with a population of 45 centre managers in Gauteng, the study began with qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with a sample of 10 managers and proceeded to a second stage where 35 participants completed a questionnaire. Of the 45 managers, 10 did not return the questionnaire. The findings reveal that managers face various challenges due to the diverse nature of these institutions, which are established by parents of disabled children, Non-Governmental Organisations, or religious organizations. The study also highlights a lack of preparatory programs for centre managers and a significant disparity in qualifications, with three-quarters holding only a matriculation certificate or lower. To address these challenges, managers have adopted Bush’s management models, including subjective, collegial, and ambiguity models. Based on these findings, the study recommends upgrading manager qualifications and providing in-service training to enhance their skills with contemporary approaches, aiming to improve leadership and management practices in centres for children with intellectual disability.

Published in International Journal of Elementary Education (Volume 13, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12
Page(s) 49-61
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Special Care Centres, Intellectual Disability, Centre Managers, Leadership and Management

References
[1] Bazeley P. (2018) Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.
[2] Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
[3] Bush, T. (2020a). Managing a crisis: A contemporary challenge for all educational leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 959–963.
[4] Bush, T. (2020b). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. Sage Publications.
[5] Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership and Management, 34(5), 553–571.
[6] Byrne, J., Shepherd, J., Dewhirst, S., Pickett, K., Speller, V., Roderick, P., & Almond, P. (2015). Pre-service teacher training in health and well-being in England: The state of the nation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 217–233.
[7] Chiarini, A., & Kumar, M. (2021). Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 integration for Operational Excellence: evidence from Italian manufacturing companies. Production planning & control, 32(13), 1084-1101.
[8] Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2012). “A Garbage Can Model” at forty: a solution that still attracts problems. In The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty (pp. 19-30). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[9] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
[10] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
[11] Dalglish, S. L., Khalid, H., & McMahon, S. A. (2020). Document analysis in health policy research: The READ approach. Health Policy and Planning, 35(10), 1424–1431.
[12] Department of Basic Education. (2017a). Draft learning programme for children with severe to profound intellectual disability.
[13] Department of Basic Education. (2017b). The draft policy for the provision of quality education and support for children with severe to profound intellectual disability.
[14] Fetters, M. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.
[15] Flink, A. R., Broberg, M., Strid, K., Thunberg, G., & Johnels, J. Å. (2023). Following children with severe or profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their mothers through a communication intervention: single-case mixed-methods findings. International journal of developmental disabilities, 69(6), 869-887.
[16] Ghasemy, M., & Hussin, S. (2014). Theories of educational management and leadership: A review. SAGE Publication.
[17] Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing Research in the Real World (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications, Inc.
[18] Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185–195.
[19] Kasunic, M. (2010). Measurement and Analysis Infrastructure Diagnostic, Version 1.0: Method Definition Document. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
[20] Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of higher education, 6(5), 26–41.
[21] Lawson, H., & Jones, P. (2018). Teachers’ pedagogical decision‐making and influences this when teaching students with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18(3), 196-210.
[22] Majid, U. (2018). Research fundamentals: Study design, population, and sample size. Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology Journal, 2, 1–7.
[23] Maree, K. (2017). First steps in research. (2nd ed.). Van Schaik.
[24] McKenzie, J., & McConkey, R. (2016). Caring for adults with intellectual disability: The perspectives of family carers in South Africa. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 29(6), 531–541.
[25] McKenzie, J. A., Pillay, S. G., Duvenhage, C. M., Du Plessis, E., & Jelsma, J. M. (2017). Implementation of educational provision for children with severe to profound intellectual disability in the Western Cape: From rights to reality. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(6), 596-611.
[26] McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson Education.
[27] Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher professional development in Finland: Towards a more holistic approach. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 279–294.
[28] Noble, N., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. BMJ Journals, 22(3).
[29] Osamwonyi, E. F. (2016). In-service education of teachers: Overview, problems, and the way forward. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 83–87.
[30] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
[31] Parahoo, K. (2014). Nursing research: Principles, process, and issues. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[32] Rendoth, T., Foggett, J., & Duncan, J. (2024). Curriculum decision-making for students with severe intellectual disabilities or profound and multiple learning difficulties. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1-18.
[33] Republic of South Africa. (1996a). South Africa schools act 84 of 1996. Government Printers.
[34] Republic of South Africa. (1996b). The South Africa constitution. Government Printers.
[35] Sepuru, M. G., & Mohlakwana, M. A. (2020). The perspectives of beginner principals on their new roles in school leadership and management: A South African case study. South African Journal of Education, 40(2), 1–11.
[36] Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-based Nursing, 20(3), 74–75.
[37] Singh, P. (2014). Intervention of transformational collegial leadership to develop human resources. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 13(1), 53–68.
[38] Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert type data in social science research: Confusion, issues, and challenges. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences, 3(2), 36–49.
[39] Vergunst, R., McKenzie, J., & Hansen, A. (2022). Capacity building for quality care and education for children with severe to profound intellectual disabilities in South Africa. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 26(3), 561–574.
[40] Zulkifly, N. A., Ismail, I. A., & Asimiran, S. (2020). Collegial and distributed leadership: Two sides of the same coin? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1–14.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Botha, R. J., Zimba, Z. (2024). Managers' Readiness and Strategies for Severe Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in Gauteng, South Africa. International Journal of Elementary Education, 13(3), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Botha, R. J.; Zimba, Z. Managers' Readiness and Strategies for Severe Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in Gauteng, South Africa. Int. J. Elem. Educ. 2024, 13(3), 49-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Botha RJ, Zimba Z. Managers' Readiness and Strategies for Severe Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in Gauteng, South Africa. Int J Elem Educ. 2024;13(3):49-61. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12,
      author = {Renier Jacobus Botha and Zondani Zimba},
      title = {Managers' Readiness and Strategies for Severe Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in Gauteng, South Africa
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Elementary Education},
      volume = {13},
      number = {3},
      pages = {49-61},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeedu.20241303.12},
      abstract = {In South Africa, learners with severe to profound intellectual disabilities have not had access to public funded education and support, leaving them vulnerable and excluded from the services available to all school-aged children. To address this national disparity, the South African government developed a Draft Policy Framework for the Provision of Quality Education and Support for Children with Severe to Profound Intellectual Disabilities, which is now being implemented in special care centres at a national level. In Gauteng, the draft policy is being implemented at the provincial level by the Gauteng Department of Education in order to achieve the national mandate. The goal of this study was to investigate how Special Care Centre managers address the challenges of managing centres for learners with intellectual disabilities in Gauteng Province. It examines the adequacy of preparation programs for these managers and evaluates the management strategies used to overcome challenges arising from deficiencies in these programs. Using an exploratory mixed-method approach with a population of 45 centre managers in Gauteng, the study began with qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with a sample of 10 managers and proceeded to a second stage where 35 participants completed a questionnaire. Of the 45 managers, 10 did not return the questionnaire. The findings reveal that managers face various challenges due to the diverse nature of these institutions, which are established by parents of disabled children, Non-Governmental Organisations, or religious organizations. The study also highlights a lack of preparatory programs for centre managers and a significant disparity in qualifications, with three-quarters holding only a matriculation certificate or lower. To address these challenges, managers have adopted Bush’s management models, including subjective, collegial, and ambiguity models. Based on these findings, the study recommends upgrading manager qualifications and providing in-service training to enhance their skills with contemporary approaches, aiming to improve leadership and management practices in centres for children with intellectual disability.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Managers' Readiness and Strategies for Severe Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study in Gauteng, South Africa
    
    AU  - Renier Jacobus Botha
    AU  - Zondani Zimba
    Y1  - 2024/09/26
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12
    T2  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    JF  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    JO  - International Journal of Elementary Education
    SP  - 49
    EP  - 61
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7640
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20241303.12
    AB  - In South Africa, learners with severe to profound intellectual disabilities have not had access to public funded education and support, leaving them vulnerable and excluded from the services available to all school-aged children. To address this national disparity, the South African government developed a Draft Policy Framework for the Provision of Quality Education and Support for Children with Severe to Profound Intellectual Disabilities, which is now being implemented in special care centres at a national level. In Gauteng, the draft policy is being implemented at the provincial level by the Gauteng Department of Education in order to achieve the national mandate. The goal of this study was to investigate how Special Care Centre managers address the challenges of managing centres for learners with intellectual disabilities in Gauteng Province. It examines the adequacy of preparation programs for these managers and evaluates the management strategies used to overcome challenges arising from deficiencies in these programs. Using an exploratory mixed-method approach with a population of 45 centre managers in Gauteng, the study began with qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with a sample of 10 managers and proceeded to a second stage where 35 participants completed a questionnaire. Of the 45 managers, 10 did not return the questionnaire. The findings reveal that managers face various challenges due to the diverse nature of these institutions, which are established by parents of disabled children, Non-Governmental Organisations, or religious organizations. The study also highlights a lack of preparatory programs for centre managers and a significant disparity in qualifications, with three-quarters holding only a matriculation certificate or lower. To address these challenges, managers have adopted Bush’s management models, including subjective, collegial, and ambiguity models. Based on these findings, the study recommends upgrading manager qualifications and providing in-service training to enhance their skills with contemporary approaches, aiming to improve leadership and management practices in centres for children with intellectual disability.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections